<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Technotheory.com &#187; Word</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.technotheory.com/category/word/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.technotheory.com</link>
	<description>Time-saving reflections on lifehacking, social media, and technology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 22:02:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Technotheory&#8217;s new design! And an odd surprise&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.technotheory.com/2008/06/technotheory-new-design-and-surprise/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technotheory.com/2008/06/technotheory-new-design-and-surprise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jared Goralnick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SET Consulting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Word]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technotheory.com/?p=311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the last week I’ve been testing a new theme design on this website.&#160; I hope it will make information easier for you to find, and promote a consistent look with my company’s other websites.&#160; You’ll be surprised to learn how we did it. (RSS/email readers, click here to see the design!) Note: The ‘we’ [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="intro"><img title="TT_logo" style="margin: 0px 0px 5px 5px" height="82" alt="TT_logo" src="http://www.technotheory.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/tt-logo-thumb.png" width="300" align="right" />For the last week I’ve been testing a new theme design on this website.&#160; I hope it will make information easier for you to find, and promote a consistent look with my company’s other websites.&#160; You’ll be surprised to learn how we did it.</p>
<p><span id="more-311"></span></p>
<p>(RSS/email readers, <a href="http://www.technotheory.com/2008/06/technotheory-new-design-and-surprise/"> click here to see the design</a>!)</p>
<p><em>Note: The ‘we’ I’m referring to is my team at <a href="http://www.setconsulting.com/services_nowebdesign.php">SET Consulting</a>.&#160; A big thank you to Keith for the design and David for the development.&#160; While we were inspired by many other blog designs, this theme was created from scratch (i.e., all modifications to the well-structured default WordPress theme).</em></p>
<h3>New Purpose</h3>
<p><img title="TT_about_technotheory" style="margin: 0px 0px 5px 5px" height="55" alt="TT_about_technotheory" src="http://www.technotheory.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/tt-about-technotheory.png" width="300" align="right" /> The first change has nothing to do with the design.&#160; I’ve simplified the purpose of the site to “<strong>You want to be happy and productive. With a slant toward technology, I try to help with that here.</strong>”&#160; I’ll still occasionally cover DC technology and often discuss social media…but the core focus has been refined.</p>
<h3>Organization Of Information</h3>
<p><img title="TT_organized" style="margin: 0px 0px 5px 5px" height="85" alt="TT_organized" src="http://www.technotheory.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/tt-organized.png" width="300" align="right" /> The main purpose of the redesign was to organize our information in a more relevant manner.&#160; We hope you’ll check out the “<strong><em>best of </em>TECHNOTHEORY</strong>” and other sidebar elements.&#160; I want to keep you aware of what I’m up to without overwhelming you with too much <em>stuff</em>—we hope this improves your experience.</p>
<h3>Consistency Between Websites</h3>
<p><img title="TT_header_tabs" style="margin: 0px 0px 5px 5px" height="63" alt="TT_header_tabs" src="http://www.technotheory.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/tt-header-tabs.png" width="300" align="right" /> Now all three of our websites use a similar color palette, and are tied together with the tabbed bar at the very top of this page.&#160; While there are improvements ahead for all sites, we think this will help you to find a consistent (and maybe someday recognizable) brand.</p>
<h3>Quick Thank You’s</h3>
<p><img title="TT_jared_face" style="margin: 0px 0px 5px 5px" height="95" alt="TT_jared_face" src="http://www.technotheory.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/tt-jared-face.png" width="300" align="right" /> While there were many sites we looked to for examples there are a few I want to mention:</p>
<ul>
<li>I love <a href="http://wordpress.org">WordPress</a>.&#160; It’s amazing what open-source software can do </li>
<li>Keith suggested making the first paragraph slightly more prominent based on a site he frequents, <a href="http://www.farfromfearless.com">farfromfearless</a>.&#160; Here’s <a href="http://www.farfromfearless.com/2008/02/13/a-small-but-great-idea-seeking-talented-open-source-developer/">an example there</a> </li>
<li>A big fan of <a href="http://www.chrisbrogan.com/">Chris Brogan</a>, that’s where I got the idea for the shaded face picture </li>
</ul>
<h3>Surprise: We Designed This In PowerPoint And Word</h3>
<p><img title="TT_sidebar_PPT" style="margin: 0px 0px 5px 5px" height="204" alt="TT_sidebar_PPT" src="http://www.technotheory.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/tt-sidebar-ppt.png" width="300" align="right" /> What you most likely wouldn’t guess is that this entire site was designed in PowerPoint and Word.&#160; We used PowerPoint for all the layout and graphics, especially in the sidebar.&#160; We used Word for the typography in each blog post.&#160; No, we didn’t export <em>any</em> code from Office—that was all done by hand in HTML, CSS, PHP, or SQL.</p>
<p>So you probably think we’re crazy?&#160; Well, we consider ourselves to be <a href="http://www.setconsulting.com/services_design.php">some of the best PowerPoint, Word, and Excel designers</a> and developers.&#160; So we wanted to practice what we preach.&#160; After all, our Microsoft Office design business has been on fire lately, with projects for Fannie Mae, NTT America, NIST, and other recognizable brands.</p>
<p><em>Do you want to know more about this?&#160; Let me know in the comments and maybe I’ll dedicate a post to the topic of Office design…</em></p>
<h3>Any Thoughts, Compatibility Issues, or Suggestions?</h3>
<p>We’re very proud of this site but have some changes in store.&#160; If we weren’t so busy with other work we’d fix up the display of posts within categories and I’d add much more to the <a href="http://www.lijit.com">Lijit</a> search functionality.&#160; But that’s not all that’s on the wish list.</p>
<p>Is there anything you’d like to see?&#160; Are you having any display issues?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technotheory.com/2008/06/technotheory-new-design-and-surprise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The &#8220;=rand&#8221; &#8220;quick brown fox&#8221; is gone in Word 2007!</title>
		<link>http://www.technotheory.com/2006/11/the-rand-quick-brown-fox-is-gone-in-word-2007/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technotheory.com/2006/11/the-rand-quick-brown-fox-is-gone-in-word-2007/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 15:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jared Goralnick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Word]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technotheory.com/2006/11/the-rand-quick-brown-fox-is-gone-in-word-2007/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Word geeks have long loved impressing our audience during demos by typing &#8220;=rand(x,y)&#8221; where x is the number of paragraphs and y is the number of sentences per paragraph. What it would do in version of Word through Word 2003 is repeat the sentence &#8220;The quick brown fox jumped over the lazy dog.&#8221; Not so [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="intro">Word geeks have long loved impressing our audience during demos by typing &#8220;=rand(<em>x</em>,<em>y</em>)&#8221; where <em>x</em> is the number of paragraphs and <em>y</em> is the number of sentences per paragraph.  What it would do in version of Word through Word 2003 is repeat the sentence &#8220;The quick brown fox jumped over the lazy dog.&#8221;</p>
<p>Not so in Word 2007.  Now it uses this mundane and &#8220;helpful&#8221; set of Word instructions&#8211;boo.  You&#8217;d think they&#8217;d just go with <a href="http://www.lipsum.com/"><em>lorem ipsum</em></a> if they wanted to use different sentences.  Anyhow, the new result repeats the following paragraph over and over:</p>
<blockquote><p>On the Insert tab, the galleries include items that are designed to coordinate with the overall look of your document. You can use these galleries to insert tables, headers, footers, lists, cover pages, and other document building blocks. When you create pictures, charts, or diagrams, they also coordinate with your current document look. You can easily change the formatting of selected text in the document text by choosing a look for the selected text from the Quick Styles gallery on the Home tab. You can also format text directly by using the other controls on the Home tab. Most controls offer a choice of using the look from the current theme or using a format that you specify directly. To change the overall look of your document, choose new Theme elements on the Page Layout tab. To change the looks available in the Quick Style gallery, use the Change Current Quick Style Set command. Both the Themes gallery and the Quick Styles gallery provide reset commands so that you can always restore the look of your document to the original contained in your current template.</p></blockquote>
<p>I understand that this offers better demo text than repeating a single sentence, but I wish it could&#8217;ve been a little more creative.  This is just begging me to write a new random generator that takes lines from <a href="http://www.brave.com/bo/lyrics/stairhea.htm"><em>Stairway to Heaven</em></a> or <a href="http://www.amazon.com/11-Report-Graphic-Adaptation/dp/0809057395/sr=8-2/qid=1163433149/ref=pd_bbs_2/104-3735336-0360711?ie=UTF8&#038;s=books"><em>The 9/11 Report</em></a> or something like that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technotheory.com/2006/11/the-rand-quick-brown-fox-is-gone-in-word-2007/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Default Word behavior I love, that most users won&#8217;t appreciate&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.technotheory.com/2006/11/default-word-behavior-i-love-that-most-users-wont-appreciate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technotheory.com/2006/11/default-word-behavior-i-love-that-most-users-wont-appreciate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 04:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jared Goralnick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Word]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technotheory.com/2006/11/default-word-behavior-i-love-that-most-users-wont-appreciate/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hear people talking all the time about how different Word&#8217;s interface looks. But the skeleton of documents looks completely different as well. Here are some initial observations on the differences in default fonts/behavior: Word 97-2003 Defaults Word 2007 Defaults Times New Roman Calibri 12 point 11 point Single Line Spacing 1.15 Line Spacing No [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="intro">I hear people talking all the time about how different Word&#8217;s <em>interface</em> looks.  But the skeleton of documents looks completely different as well.  Here are some initial observations on the differences in default fonts/behavior:</p>
<div align="center">
<table width="350" border="1">
<tr>
<td align="center"><strong>Word <u>97-2003</u> Defaults</strong></td>
<td align="center"><strong>Word <u>2007</u> Defaults</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Times New Roman</td>
<td>Calibri</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>12 point</td>
<td>11 point</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Single Line Spacing</td>
<td>1.15 Line Spacing</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>No space between paragraphs (press Enter twice)</td>
<td>10pt after each paragraph (press Enter once)</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
<p>Here&#8217;s how it looks:</p>
<div style="text-align: center"><img class="centered" width="457" height="239" alt="Interface Changes in Word 2007" id="image55" src="http://www.technotheory.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/11/word_2007_interface_changes.png" /></div>
<p>This is a huge change.  People aren&#8217;t used to having the cursor skip a line when they press Enter.  (Even though After Spacing is more precise and better maintains consistency).  I wonder how long it&#8217;ll take people to find this command:</p>
<div style="text-align: center"><img class="centered" width="343" height="253" alt="Before and After Spacing in the Interface" id="image57" src="http://www.technotheory.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/11/word_2007_after_spacing.png" /></div>
<p>On the one hand, they&#8217;ll find it and fix their problem&#8230;but then if they use it I think people are going to have trouble deciding when to use the Before command when to use the After command.  I&#8217;m just afraid consistency is going to be difficult for people to achieve at first&#8211;when things are unfamiliar and the old way no longer ways.</p>
<p>Well, Microsoft, you&#8217;re certainly going to give me work as a trainer&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technotheory.com/2006/11/default-word-behavior-i-love-that-most-users-wont-appreciate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Finally, Microsoft: Cross-References work!</title>
		<link>http://www.technotheory.com/2006/10/finally-microsoft-cross-references-work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technotheory.com/2006/10/finally-microsoft-cross-references-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 19:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jared Goralnick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Word]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technotheory.com/2006/10/finally-microsoft-cross-references-work/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve recently upgraded my primary workstation to Office 2007, Internet Explorer 7, and Firefox 2. I took the necessary precautions, but honestly everything has worked out smoothly (partly because I&#8217;d been using the products in our demo environment for some time). Okay, the only problems I&#8217;ve run into are Treo sync issues and Firefox crashing. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="intro">I&#8217;ve recently upgraded my primary workstation to Office 2007, Internet Explorer 7, and Firefox 2.  I took the necessary precautions, but honestly everything has worked out smoothly (partly because I&#8217;d been using the products in our demo environment for some time).  Okay, the only problems I&#8217;ve run into are Treo sync issues and Firefox crashing.  But while these upgrades are likely fodder for their own post, I&#8217;d just like to thank Microsoft for finally allowing the user to resize the Cross-Reference window.  I&#8217;ve complained about this for years&#8211;nothing was more painful than a cross-reference window that was tiny and constantly lost its place when inserting references.  Finally it&#8217;s been fixed&#8211;both problems!  Thank you, Microsoft.</p>
<div style="text-align: center"><img class="centered" id="image53" src="http://www.technotheory.com/images/crossreferences2.png" alt="Cross References in Microsoft Word 2007" width="359" height="534" /></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technotheory.com/2006/10/finally-microsoft-cross-references-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quick Reminder Trick for Outlook</title>
		<link>http://www.technotheory.com/2006/03/quick-reminder-trick-for-outlook/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technotheory.com/2006/03/quick-reminder-trick-for-outlook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 19:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jared Goralnick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Word]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technotheory.com/2006/03/quick-reminder-trick-for-outlook/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I live off my Outlook reminders. But one of the things that&#8217;s always annoyed me is that, when dealing with task reminders, you can dismiss them or open the item to which they refer&#8230;but you can&#8217;t simply mark a task as completed with the click of a button. Up until now I&#8217;ve always opened the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="intro">I live off my Outlook reminders.  But one of the things that&#8217;s always annoyed me is that, when dealing with task reminders, you can dismiss them or open the item to which they refer&#8230;but you can&#8217;t simply mark a task as completed with the click of a button.  Up until now I&#8217;ve always opened the item and then changed its status to completed.</p>
<p>Today I just realized that you can right-click on a task reminder and choose to mark it complete without opening the item.  It&#8217;s really that easy:</p>
<ol>
<li>Right click on a task in your &#8220;Reminders&#8221; window</li>
<li>Select <strong>Mark Complete</strong></li>
</ol>
<div style="text-align: center"><img class="centered" title="Outlook reminders trick" alt="Outlook reminders trick" src="http://www.technotheory.com/images/wp/outlook_reminders_trick.gif" /></div>
<p>Enjoy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technotheory.com/2006/03/quick-reminder-trick-for-outlook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Outsmarted Word Today</title>
		<link>http://www.technotheory.com/2006/02/i-outsmarted-word-today/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technotheory.com/2006/02/i-outsmarted-word-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jared Goralnick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Word]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technotheory.com/2006/02/i-outsmarted-word-today/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;or at least it felt that way. You see, I pride myself on having a fairly extensive vocabulary, which occasionally leads to my being pleonastic or pedantic&#8230;but nonetheless I&#8217;ve always enjoyed richness in words (such as that discussed in the Word Nerds podcast). Anyhow, today I came across a flattering dialog box in Microsoft Word: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="intro">&#8230;or at least it felt that way.  You see, I pride myself on having a fairly extensive vocabulary, which occasionally leads to my being <a target="_blank" href="http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/pleonastic">pleonastic</a> or pedantic&#8230;but nonetheless I&#8217;ve always enjoyed richness in words (such as that discussed in the <a target="_blank" href="http://thewordnerds.org/">Word Nerds podcast</a>).  Anyhow, today I came across a flattering dialog box in Microsoft Word:</p>
<p align="center"><img class="centered" alt="Custom Dictionary full in Word" title="Custom Dictionary full in Word" src="http://www.technotheory.com/images/wp/full_dictionary.gif" /></p>
<p>For thirty seconds I considered the possibility that Word was not in err and that I had in fact exceeded its capacity for vocabulary.<span id="more-22"></span></p>
<p>In actuality, it&#8217;s possible to run out of space using Word&#8217;s custom dictionary, which is capped at 64kb (around 10,000 words).  However, the more likely scenario was that my spelling/grammar tool was corrupt.  Sure enough, after following the steps outlined in <a target="_blank" href="http://helpdesk.wisc.edu/page.php?id=2314">this informative help-desk article</a>, all was once again copacetic&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technotheory.com/2006/02/i-outsmarted-word-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advanced Basics: Word Search &amp; Replace</title>
		<link>http://www.technotheory.com/2006/02/advanced-basics-word-search-replace/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technotheory.com/2006/02/advanced-basics-word-search-replace/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2006 18:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jared Goralnick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Word]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technotheory.com/2006/02/advanced-basics-1-search-replace/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By now you&#8217;ve probably used Search &#038; Replace in Word, and you may have even tried some of the advanced tools within it. However, as an efficiency trainer, I get to see that there&#8217;s a huge difference between those who use this tool versus those who have mastered it. The result of mastery? A heck [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="intro">By now you&#8217;ve probably used Search &#038; Replace in Word, and you may have even tried some of the advanced tools within it.  However, as an efficiency trainer, I get to see that there&#8217;s a huge difference between those who use this tool versus those who have mastered it.  The result of mastery?  A heck of a lot of frustration and time saved.  Maybe even some bragging rights.  But enough talk&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Tip 1. Don&#8217;t perform a &#8220;Replace All.&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>Inevitably there&#8217;s going to be something that doesn&#8217;t fit a pattern.  You have two choices, you can refine your search (see below) to a more specific term (which is a good idea, but can be time consuming) or you can take the extra 20 seconds to review each item before replacing it.  And, for the record, you don&#8217;t need to keep pressing <strong>Find</strong> and then <strong>Replace</strong>. By merely pressing <strong>Replace </strong>(or better yet, pressing R on the keyboard!), Word will move you between each selection and then replace it.  A quick glance before each replacement will ensure much more accurate search &#038; replaces.</p>
<p><strong>Tip 2. Refine your searches</strong></p>
<p><span id="more-14"></span>I love the <strong>More </strong>button.  If you haven&#8217;t clicked on this before, shame on you.  I highly encourage to consider how you can refine your searches to make them work better for you.  For instance, let&#8217;s say you wanted to search for the word &#8220;soft&#8221; but didn&#8217;t want to find instances of the s-o-f-t in &#8220;software&#8221; or &#8220;Microsoft.&#8221;  This would be a good reason to check <strong>Find whole words only</strong>.  Simiarly, I&#8217;m working with a product that has &#8220;Hosted&#8221; in its title.  When the product was renamed, a search for &#8220;hosted&#8221; would return a lot of incorrect results, but Hosted (with <strong>Match Case</strong> checked) would be much more likely to produce many more valid results.</p>
<p><img class="centered" align="middle" title="Search &#038; Replace Advanced" alt="Search &#038; Replace Advanced" src="http://www.technotheory.com/images/wp/find_rep1.gif" /></p>
<p><strong>Tip 3. Now let&#8217;s dig a little deeper</strong></p>
<p>Two of my favorite things to search for are ^p and ^l, which are Word&#8217;s special codes for paragraph break (hard return) and line break (soft/shift return).  I often need to clean up hard returns in an email&#8217;s text that I&#8217;ve copied and pasted into a document.  Other times I&#8217;ve writen something in Word but I want a clean way to add html tags.  In the case of the latter, I might search for &#8220;^p^p&#8221; and replace it with &#8220;&lt;/p&gt;^p^p&lt;p&gt;&#8221;. This will perform a search for two successive presses of the  &lt;ENTER&gt; key and replace them with the appropriate HTML tags.  The additional character codes are available in the <strong>Special </strong>drop down menu pictured above.  Some other neat codes are ^t for tab and ^+ for emdash&#8230;</p>
<p>Sometimes I&#8217;ll want to search for text that&#8217;s formatted one way and alter it to another set of formatting. Granted, I use styles so this is less of an issue, but when working on others&#8217; documents I frequently find centered headings that need to be left aligned, made larger, and become bold.  By using the <strong>Format </strong>drop down I can search for centered text:</p>
<ol>
<li>Place your cursor in the <strong>Find what </strong>textbox.</li>
<li>Click on the <strong>Format </strong>button and select <strong>Paragraph<br />
</strong></li>
<li>In the <strong>Alignment </strong>dropdown, choose <strong>Centered</strong></li>
<li>Click <strong>OK</strong></li>
<li>Note how Centered is now listed under the <strong>Find what </strong>textbox:</li>
</ol>
<p><img class="centered" title="Centered Format" alt="Centered Format" src="http://www.technotheory.com/images/wp/format_centered.gif" /></p>
<p>Then I can replace all centered text with Left-Aligned, Bold, 16pt text:</p>
<ol>
<li>Place your cursor in the <strong>Replace with </strong>textbox.</li>
<li>Click on the <strong>Format </strong>button and select <strong>Paragraph<br />
</strong></li>
<li>In the <strong>Alignment </strong>dropdown, choose <strong>Left<br />
</strong></li>
<li>Click on the <strong>Format </strong>button and select <strong>Font<br />
</strong></li>
<li>In the <strong>Alignment </strong>dropdown, choose <strong>Left<br />
</strong></li>
<li>In the <strong>Font Style </strong>selector, choose <strong>Bold</strong></li>
<li>In the <strong>Size </strong>selector, choose <strong>16</strong></li>
<li>Click <strong>OK</strong></li>
<li>Note how the <strong>Replace with </strong>formatting has now changed:</li>
</ol>
<p><img class="centered" title="Font formatting" alt="Font formatting" src="http://www.technotheory.com/images/wp/format_font.gif" /></p>
<p>This is a fast way to change all the formatting in a long document that was created without styles.</p>
<p><strong>Tip 4. Just be careful</strong></p>
<p>When you use all these formatting commands, just be careful to clear out your textboxes and formatting.  Before performing a new search, it&#8217;s a good idea to click in each of the textboxes and make sure there are no spaces. Then be sure to click <strong>No Formatting</strong> in each of the text boxes.  You may also need to turn off <strong>Match Case</strong> or <strong>Find whole words only</strong>.</p>
<p><em>Hopefully this&#8217;ll make your editing lives just a little easier&#8230;</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technotheory.com/2006/02/advanced-basics-word-search-replace/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

